>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 21:03, Paul Sander wrote: >> >--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >[ On , February 21, 2002 at 18:55:21 (-0500), Arcin Bozkurt - Archie wrote: ] >> >> Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
>> And going the other way, suppose a rename was done and a new file takes >> the place of the old one in the filesystem. Now you have a dangerous >> situation in which a single RCS files contains partial version histories >> of multiple files. It's dangerous because it opens up the possibility of >> someone merging inappropriate changes from one branch to another, from >> one file to another. >A question on merge behaviour of cvs: Will CVS be able to follow a file >disappearing in one module, appearing in another one? I would say no. >And therefore a merge would not be able to propogate bugfixes on that >file even though the file is not deleted, and resurrected for another, >etc. >Am I right? You are correct. >--- End of forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
