--- "Greg A. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You really need to learn more about how CVS works > internally. If you > had chosen CVS because RCS was insufficient for your > needs then I think > you would be happy not to have such a mapping layer. > CVS handles > renames by way of removing and adding files. No > history is lost, but > also no complications are introduced by such a > mapping layer.
What complications are you implying? > Implementing a mapping layer in CVS will hurt CVS. > It is impossible to > implement such a mapping layer without destroying > backwards > compatability. Like I said before, one would be destroying forward compatibility, not backward compatibility. I see nothing wrong with doing this, since if you need to maintain forward compatibility, don't use the new feature (ie "cvs mv"). Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
