On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:07:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:20:25AM +0100, Christian Andersson wrote: > > They do use some orb-list to identify the spam, although they do not stop > > the e-mails from these "blocked" server, they just insert some new header > > tags, that state that the message is from a server that is blocked via orbz > > or some other list, and let us filter the messages :-( > > I've seen this claim in a couple of messages in this thread, but > when I went back through the day's spam, I could not find any such > spam-indicating header.
How about these? > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 09:53:54 > X-RBL-Warning: (inputs.orbz.org) Open relay input. See >http://orbz.org/?211.181.167.7 > X-RBL-Warning: (relays.ordb.org) Blackholed by ORDB -- see ><http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=211.181.167.7> Whether the sender's host is an open relay is far from a perfect heuristic for identifying spam -- and whether the open-relay-tracking projects identify it as such is less perfect yet. In the last 50 spam messages I've received from info-cvs, only 22 of them have had X-RBL-Warning headers. (And some non-spam *has* had them, though I'm not sure how recently that happened.) -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next. - Anonymous _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
