On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:12:45PM -0700, Paul Sander wrote:
> I thought the idea here was to propogate version histories between multiple
> repositories, not to keep multiple sandboxes in synch.
>
> The method you propose does the latter, and doesn't accomodate local changes
> to both sandboxes. It also provides no means to transfer other stuff such
> as RCS states and tags.
Oops, you're right! But it syncs them between two disconnected
repo's, which makes it a partial solution -- perhaps good enough
for some folks. It doesn't sync tags or intermediate revisions.
Re. "local changes to both sandboxes": why not? If you mean by
this a file that's been changed in both places, the merge from
branch to trunk (after propagating the changes to the other repo)
will handle that.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
Anyone who swims with the current will reach the big music steamship;
whoever swims against the current will perhaps reach the source.
- Paul Schneider-Esleben
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
