On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:06, Larry Jones wrote:
> Eric Siegerman writes:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:16:47AM -0500, Larry Jones wrote:
> > > You need to specify both the branch and the date. Unfortunately, not
> > > all CVS subcommands allow both -D and -r at the same time [...]
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Existing inconsistency coupled with profound indecision over exactly how
> to best provide the capability. Some places in CVS allow you to specify
> a branch and a date in a single package, like update -j's branch:date
> syntax. Other places, like update, allow specifying -r and -D at the
> same time. Still other places, most notably diff, allow -r and -D at
> the same time, but interpret them as specifying two different revisions
> rather than jointly specifying a single revision. Trying to unify all
> that is a daunting task, particulary when you try to ensure that the
> result will be upward compatible (for all of clients, servers, and
> users).
Thank you for clarifying that.
Hrm. Given that some places (such as diff) need to be able to specify -r
and -D to mean two distinct revisions, would the branch:date syntax be
the most effective answer?
And given that it's an expansion of functionality, is there a problem
with implementing it in the next version and then allowing other
development teams to add it as they go?
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anthill.echidna.id.au/~jenn/
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
