Jenn Vesperman writes: > > Hrm. Given that some places (such as diff) need to be able to specify -r > and -D to mean two distinct revisions, would the branch:date syntax be > the most effective answer?
Probably. Unfortunately, it's more complicated to implement than just allowing -r and -D to coexist -- in most cases, the existing code already does the right thing if you just remove the check. > And given that it's an expansion of functionality, is there a problem > with implementing it in the next version and then allowing other > development teams to add it as they go? Probably not. Note, however, that it's a lot more work than just updating the code -- you need to update the documentation as well. -Larry Jones Why can't I ever build character in a Miami condo or a casino somewhere? -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
