Quite right.  Now how did that get there...

I'll have to check out our procedures to see how it got tagged.  It
shouldn't have.

Thanks, I'll sleep easier tonight.

--- Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wayne Johnson writes:
> > 
> > I recently attempted to merge changes from this branch onto the trunk
> and
> > found that the cvs up -j from_here -j to_here command was attempting
> to
> > remove several files from the trunk.  
> > 
> > The problem is that the files had been newly added to the trunk and
> had
> > never been on the maintanance branch.
> > 
> > Anyone have a clue as to why this happened.  
> 
> If you look at the problem files with "cvs status -v", you'll probably
> find that they have the "from_here" tag but not the "to_here" tag. 
> 
> -Larry Jones
> 
> I've got PLENTY of common sense!  I just choose to ignore it. -- Calvin


=====
---
Wayne Johnson,             | There are two kinds of people: Those 
3943 Penn Ave. N.          | who say to God, "Thy will be done," 
Minneapolis, MN 55412-1908 | and those to whom God says, "All right, 
(612) 522-7003             | then,  have it your way." --C.S. Lewis

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Reply via email to