Kevin Layer writes: > > "Wouldn't be that hard" is an overstatement. To close the harzard > completely would be hard, otherwise it would have been done already.
It actually wouldn't be difficult, but it would be a lot of tedious work for very little benefit -- lack of atomicity usually isn't a problem and when it is, it is almost always easily fixed. It would also impact performance, significantly in some cases. -Larry Jones I don't want to be THIS good! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
