Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Kevin Layer writes: >> > >> > "Wouldn't be that hard" is an overstatement. To close the harzard >> > completely would be hard, otherwise it would have been done already. >> >> It actually wouldn't be difficult, but it would be a lot of tedious work >> for very little benefit -- lack of atomicity usually isn't a problem and >> when it is, it is almost always easily fixed. It would also impact >> performance, significantly in some cases.
"A lot of tedious" and "wouldn't be difficult" would seem to be contradictory. Either way, in cases where it matters, how is it easily fixed? >> >> -Larry Jones >> >> I don't want to be THIS good! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
