-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Derek Robert Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like the idea of treating `-r <tag>:<datespec>' like `-j
> <tag>:<datespec>'. Not that I have time to code it just now, but has
> anyone come up with objections to that format?
I like the idea of `-r <tag>:<datespec>' in general.
However, it becomes harder for things like cvs log where
`-r <tag>:<token>' already treats <token> as rev2.
This means that
cvs log -rmytag:now
would be ambiguous. Is 'now' a tag or a time?
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAbLem3x41pRYZE/gRAjefAJ9vEVWN1xvNtuIwa7LMSXXf79ZjxgCgorhy
rEraHQqiltix/fCLAmPRguE=
=QQpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
