Right - I don't want to destroy the history, I just want to prevent future work from being performed on that branch. More to prevent accidental updates to it than anything else.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Cenedese Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: loosing branch when updating to a tag on the branch >> This brings up a question I've had for quite a while: is there a way >> to "close" a branch? >The only thing I can think of offhand would be to mark the tip of the >branch as dead, by using 'cvs remove'. It won't prevent anyone from >resurrecting the branch, though. It defeats version control, but can't you remove all versions on the branch and then remove the branch tag itself? That is of course only if the branch was just for some work and the work is now in the trunk. bye Fabi _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
