Hi Edwin,

> Maybe this is an obviously stupid suggestion but how about in your second
> method instead of deleting, you rename it... Then rename it back after you
> do the update?
OK, that would solve it, but yes, it doesn't really sound like a perfect
solution, because I'd have to rename, update and rename again... Strange!
:)

Marko


_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Reply via email to