[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:25:50 +0000, Springfield wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: >>> (And please consider not using that style of quoting, most people >>> don't, and it just confuses most non-emacs-supercite readers).
Thanks. I will consider that but I'm not sure how it should confuse readers. I think it looked very clear who wrote what... >> I'd just like to follow that up with a hear hear. That style of posting >> really screws up the formatting of deep posts. Ok. > I do not dislike the style as such - I think it can help in threads with > many relies, because you can see who wrote what directly and don't > have to compare number of '>'s with author. The most annoying thing is with "deep" discussion where people delete who wrote what and then you can't keep track of who wrote what... But I'll read about supercite and consider it. > The problem is all the discussions from people that do dislike the > style - or don't understand it - that inevatibly ensue, IMHO. :-) Best regards Martin Jørgensen -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Home of Martin Jørgensen - http://www.martinjoergensen.dk _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
