[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Jørgensen) writes: >>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Sjøgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Adam> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:59:00 +0100, Martin wrote: > >> Thanks. I will consider that but I'm not sure how it should > >> confuse readers. I think it looked very clear who wrote what... > > Adam> Maybe people care less now - as they seem to do with > Adam> top-posting - I used to be flamed for using the "Name>"-style; > Adam> after a while I came to the conclusion that it wasn't worth > Adam> the trouble. > > Aha.... I'll just watch and see what people think about this posting > style and if they get too annoyed, I'll stop again...
I had a passing fling with Supercite several years ago. I stopped mostly because my citations looked different from everyone else's, and the styles didn't really play well together. The style I really wanted was a composite indent-and-attribute style like Adam> second-level post MJ> Your reply to adam. DZM> If only Supercite did what I wanted! The other problem I never figured out how to solve is filling in "other" attributions -- where you quote Adam quoting you, the ">>" should get replaced with your own initials, but that involves some logic capable of searching the article history and figuring that out. > BTW: Where does all that white-space in the beginning of my citation > come from? Hmm.... I only added these 3 lines to my .emacs: > > (autoload 'sc-cite-original "supercite" "Supercite 3.1" t) > (autoload 'sc-submit-bug-report "supercite" "Supercite 3.1" t) > (setq message-cite-function 'sc-cite-original) My guess is sc-citation-leader, poking at some variables. --dzm _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
