On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:28 PM, prad <[email protected]> wrote:
> so nognus must be the git version i guess. The gnus development versioning totally confused me for a long time (still does). I think this may be an intentional effect. Quote: If you happen upon a version of Gnus that has a prefixed name -- "(ding) Gnus", "September Gnus", "Red Gnus", "Quassia Gnus", "Pterodactyl Gnus", "Oort Gnus", "No Gnus" -- don't panic. Don't let it know that you're frightened. Back away. Slowly. Whatever you do, don't run. Walk away, calmly, until you're out of its reach. Find a proper released version of Gnus and snuggle up to that instead.[1] -Brett. [1] http://www.gnus.org/manual/gnus_349.html#SEC352 [2] see also: http://www.gnus.org/manual/gnus_355.html#SEC358 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
