Brett Viren <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:28 PM, prad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> so nognus must be the git version i guess. > > The gnus development versioning totally confused me for a long time > (still does). I think this may be an intentional effect.
I think you might be right. Why not just call it "development Gnus" or something? _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
