On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:45:53 -0400, Dan wrote:
> What I don't understand is that *bold* is supposed to be achieved by
> using asterisks instead of underlines. When I use asterisks that
> way, sure enough, the word in question is displayed as bold. But I
> see the asterisks too.
> When I do the same with underlines, I don't see extra underlines before
> and after the word.
> Is the problem on my end or is this inconsistency done on purpose?
It was done on purpose a good while back. I don't remember the reason,
though.
I do remember thinking it was an odd inconsistency to introduce, but it
didn't bother me enough to complain at the time :-)
Best regards,
Adam
--
"You have to photosynthesize" Adam Sjøgren
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
