Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > Dan Espen <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi Dan, > >> What I don't understand is that *bold* is supposed to be achieved by >> using asterisks instead of underlines. When I use asterisks that >> way, sure enough, the word in question is displayed as bold. But I >> see the asterisks too. > > The reason is that many special emacs buffers have names enclosed in > asterisks, e.g., *Group*, *Messages*, and *unsent mail*. So not > removing the asterisks certainly makes sense when discussing emacs > related stuff.
Interesting. Now I'm not sure what I want. > If you wanted to, you could use `gnus-parameters' to set > `gnus-emphasis-alist' in a way that removes the asterisks in non-emacs > related groups. Just looked at gnus-emphasis-alist. It's as clear as mud. (I suppose I can figure it out.) Thanks all. -- Dan Espen _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
