On Wed, Jul 11 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi Eric, > >> Okay, but this doesn't actually work as advertised… I've got: >> >> gnus-thread-sort-functions -> ((not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date)) > > You should always include `gnus-thread-sort-by-number' in the list, > probably as first (least important) element.
Okay, I added that in, but it didn't make any difference. I eval gnus-thread-sort-function: (gnus-thread-sort-by-number (not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date)) That's what it gives me. > Sorry, from that "screenshot" I cannot even determine which messages > belong to one thread. I think the first 3, then the next 2, then 1, > then 4, right? Sorry, should have been clearer, but your interpretation is quite correct. This sorting remains the same even with the above change to `gnus-thread-sort-by-number'. > In that case, the two first threads should be below the others... I > checked in some mail group here, and for me it works just fine. Mine doesn't look like yours! The only other thread-related customization I've got is: (setq gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function 'gnus-gather-threads-by-references) Would that make any difference? -- GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2012-07-08 on pellet Ma Gnus v0.6 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
