Eric Abrahamsen <[email protected]> writes: > Okay, I added that in, but it didn't make any difference. I eval > gnus-thread-sort-function: > > (gnus-thread-sort-by-number (not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date)) > > That's what it gives me.
Strange, I'm running today's git gnus, but it has worked for me for years. >> In that case, the two first threads should be below the others... I >> checked in some mail group here, and for me it works just fine. > > Mine doesn't look like yours! The only other thread-related > customization I've got is: > > (setq gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function > 'gnus-gather-threads-by-references) > > Would that make any difference? No, I have the same. Is there a chance that you've set a different sorting strategy in the group you used for testing (e.g., as a group parameter which might end up in ~/.newsrc.eld)? What does `C-h v gnus-thread-sort-functions' in that wrongly sorted summary tell? Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
