Emanuel Berg <[email protected]> writes:
>> Well, some system running SpamAssassin inserted those, not the
>> spammers ;-)
> Of course, but it doesn't do much good if the headers are only
> inserted and that will be that, does it?
What else do you propose should(/suppose would) happen?
If the mailserver deleted the email, you would be quite angry in case it
misdetected non-spam as spam...
> You mean like this?
> (setq nnmail-split-methods
> '(("spam" "^X-Spam-Flag: YES")
> ("mail.misc" "") ))
I use fancy splitting, but yes, that looks about right comparing to the
documentation. The examples do not start with ^, so you may want to try
without it, if it doesn't work; see next paragraph.
You can test where an existing email would be split to by pressing B q
when looking at it.
And you can get Gnus to put it where the splitting rules say by pressing
B r.
> I hope I won't get them in a directory called "spam", now!
Why? Wouldn't the point be to separate them out from the non-spam email?
Where would you like them to go? Remember that spam classification isn't
perfect.
> I tested sending a mail to myself with "X-Spam-Flag: YES" as a header,
> but it was delivered to mail.misc, and the header had been removed.
> Perhaps SpamAssassin thought that wasn't spam, and I got overruled.
Yeah, otherwise spammers would just set "X-Spam-Flag: NO" - so usually
mail servers that run SpamAssassin will remove any of those headers,
before adding what the mail server itself thinks.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"[...] but beyond that the Fry household had as much Adam Sjøgren
interest or understanding of sport as a potato has of [email protected]
Riemann's zeta function."
_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
