[email protected] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > Dmitrii Kashin <[email protected]> writes: > >> And of course this is not a good practice to use gnus for sorting your >> mail. It is very slow and local-only. > > What works horribly for you may very well work great for the next guy.
This was not emotions. I've specifically got rather definite claims. 2 years ago I got and spitted mail by gnus. And... First of all, this was very slow while downloading big attachments. And I needed to wait for a very long time in order to continue reading mail. Secondly, it was good to me only until I bought a second computer (laptop). How would you manage mail if you could do it only with one of you computers? And what did I need the second computer for in this case? For all except communication? Now I get mail via imap sorting it on server side by sieve. For most mailing lists I use gmane transport, and for all of my rss I use gwene. In comparison with nnmail and nnrss this works supersonic and in background, by the way. If I did everything right in the beginning, I would not spend so much time for reorganization of my mailing system. > Using Gnus to split my email has served me great for the past 15+ years, > and I think it is a perfectly fine practice. I would like to know how you solved the problems with speed described above.
pgpcLJcWOBTHB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
