[email protected] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > Because I want to respect the wishes of the people I > respond to.
Yeah, but are you sure this was set by the OP? He might be using some software that has that by default. > Also, I think setting X-No-Archive is kind of silly, > if not asocial. This functionality helps to showcase > that. Yeah - why shouldn't it be archived? Many times I Google a problem I see that some other guy has asked about that same problem, and the following discussion helps me to solve it, just as it helped him before me. > In some environments the use of "X-" for > non-standardized headers has been deprecated, as I > understand it, but there are a number of de facto > standard X-headers. OK. Who then decides if it is a standard or not and is this later formalized in some RFC? Intuitively it seems a bad idea to prefix as "not standard" as that would have to be changed (i.e., "X-" removed) if it ever made it to the standard. -- underground experts united _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
