Emanuel Berg <[email protected]> writes: > Yeah, but are you sure this was set by the OP? He might > be using some software that has that by default.
I don't know of any software that does - but of course, anything is possible. X-No-Archive is a quite well-established convention. > Yeah - why shouldn't it be archived? There can be many reasons. In the more technical groups it is perhaps less relevant than in other groups. > OK. Who then decides if it is a standard or not and is this later > formalized in some RFC? The standard says which headers are defined. I don't remember how the RFC process works, ask Wikipedia/Google :-) > Intuitively it seems a bad idea to prefix as "not standard" as that > would have to be changed (i.e., "X-" removed) if it ever made it to > the standard. Well, it would also be bad if a standard could not start using a name just because somebody "took it". There are arguments both ways. Best regards, Adam -- "Sunday morning when the rain begins to fall Adam Sjøgren I believe I have seen the end of it all" [email protected] _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
