Re: Sync_client or rsync/zfs

[Sven Schwedas]

On 31.01.23 18:06, Albert Shih wrote:

Le 30/01/2023 à 09:31:04+0100, Sven Schwedas a écrit

On 19.01.23 11:04, Albert Shih wrote:

Jan 19 10:20:37 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! The 
remote Server(s) denied the operation
Jan 19 10:21:27 FQDN sync_client[56922]: MAILBOX received NO response: Unknown 
error
Jan 19 10:21:27 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! The 
remote Server(s) denied the operation
Jan 19 10:21:39 FQDN sync_client[56922]: IOERROR: zero length response to 
MAILBOX (end of file reached)
Jan 19 10:21:39 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! Bad 
protocol

What's in the slaves' logs when this happens?

Nothing special.

That does smell like a bug, but I guess it doesn't matter now.

When I install the system the idea is to have both. But with time cyrus
work fine .... but the sync.

So I'm thinking to drop the sync and just keep the zfs send/recv

It's what we've been doing for a few years now, and so far it has been working fine. We're taking and shipping snapshots every five minutes, that's fine with the users and keeps the performance impact minimal.

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<<< multipart/mixed; boundary=------------k0guXalYmPl9vFXM2PhH39FB; protected-headers=v1; boundary="----------=_1675240346-499553-1"; charset="UTF-8": Unrecognized >>>