August 1, 2011
Tea Party’s War on America
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/opinion/the-tea-partys-war-on-america.html

By JOE NOCERA

You know what they say: Never negotiate with terrorists. It only encourages 
them.

These last few months, much of the country has watched in horror as the Tea 
Party Republicans have waged jihad on the American people. Their intransigent 
demands for deep spending cuts, coupled with their almost gleeful willingness 
to destroy one of America’s most invaluable assets, its full faith and credit, 
were incredibly irresponsible. But they didn’t care. Their goal, they believed, 
was worth blowing up the country for, if that’s what it took.

Like ideologues everywhere, they scorned compromise. When John Boehner, the 
House speaker, tried to cut a deal with President Obama that included some 
modest revenue increases, they humiliated him. After this latest agreement was 
finally struck on Sunday night — amounting to a near-complete capitulation by 
Obama — Tea Party members went on Fox News to complain that it only called for 
$2.4 trillion in cuts, instead of $4 trillion. It was head-spinning.

All day Monday, the blogosphere and the talk shows mused about which party 
would come out ahead politically. Honestly, who cares? What ought to matter is 
not how these spending cuts will affect our politicians, but how they’ll affect 
the country. And I’m not even talking about the terrible toll $2.4 trillion in 
cuts will take on the poor and the middle class. I am talking about their 
effect on America’s still-ailing  economy.

America’s real crisis is not a debt crisis. It’s an unemployment crisis. Yet 
this agreement not only doesn’t address unemployment, it’s guaranteed to make 
it worse. (Incredibly, the Democrats even abandoned their demand for extended 
unemployment benefits as part of the deal.) As Mohamed El-Erian, the chief 
executive of the bond investment firm Pimco, told me, fiscal policy includes 
both a numerator and a denominator. “The numerator is debt,” he said. “But the 
denominator is growth.” He added, “What we have done is accelerate forward, in 
a self-inflicted manner, the numerator. And, in the process, we have undermined 
the denominator.” Economic growth could have gone a long way toward shrinking 
the deficit, while helping put people to work. The spending cuts will shrink 
growth and raise the likelihood of pushing the country back into recession.

Inflicting more pain on their countrymen doesn’t much bother the Tea Party 
Republicans, as they’ve repeatedly proved. What is astonishing is that both the 
president and House speaker are claiming that the deal will help the economy. 
Do they really expect us to buy that? We’ve all heard what happened in 1937 
when Franklin Roosevelt, believing the Depression was over, tried to rein in 
federal spending.  Cutting spending spiraled the country right back into the 
Great Depression, where it stayed until the arrival of the stimulus package 
known as World War II. That’s the path we’re now on. Our enemies could not have 
designed a better plan to weaken the American economy than this debt-ceiling 
deal.

One thing Roosevelt did right during the Depression was legislate into being a 
social safety net to soften the blows that a free-market economy can mete out 
in tough times. During this recession, it’s as if the government is going out 
of its way to make sure the blows are even more severe than they have to be. 
The debt-ceiling debate reflects a harsher, less empathetic America. It’s sad 
to see.

My own view is that Obama should have played the 14th Amendment card, using its 
language about “the validity of the public debt” to unilaterally raise the debt 
ceiling. Yes, he would have infuriated the Republicans, but so what? They 
already view him as the Antichrist. Legal scholars believe that Congress would 
not have been able to sue to overturn his decision. Inexplicably, he chose 
instead a course of action that maximized the leverage of the Republican 
extremists.

Assuming the Senate passes the bill on Tuesday, the debt ceiling will be a 
nonissue until after the next election. But the debilitating deficit battles 
are by no means over. Thanks to this deal, a newly formed supercommittee of 
Congress is supposed to target another $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion in cuts 
by late November. If those cuts don’t become law by Dec. 23, automatic 
across-the-board cuts will be imposed, including deep reductions in defense 
spending.

As has been explained ad nauseam, the threat of defense cuts is supposed to 
give the Republicans an incentive to play fair with the Democrats in the 
negotiations. But with our soldiers still fighting in Afghanistan, which side 
is going to blink if the proposed cuts threaten to damage national security? 
Just as they did with the much-loathed bank bailout, which most Republicans 
spurned even though financial calamity loomed, the Democrats will do the 
responsible thing. Apparently, that’s their problem.

For now, the Tea Party Republicans can put aside their suicide vests. But rest 
assured: They’ll have them on again soon enough. After all, they’ve gotten so 
much encouragement.
_______________________________________________
Infowarrior mailing list
[email protected]
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/infowarrior

Reply via email to