http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/11/03/electronic.voting.ap/index.html

Touchscreen voting troubles reported

Wednesday, November 3, 2004 Posted: 11:42 AM EST (1642 GMT)


FORT LAUDERDALE, Florida (AP) -- Voters nationwide reported some 1,100
problems with electronic voting machines on Tuesday, including trouble
choosing their intended candidates.

The e-voting glitches reported to the Election Protection Coalition, an
umbrella group of volunteer poll monitors that set up a telephone hotline,
included malfunctions blamed on everything from power outages to incompetent
poll workers.

But there were also several dozen voters in six states -- particularly
Democrats in Florida -- who said the wrong candidates appeared on their
touchscreen machine's checkout screen, the coalition said.

In many cases, voters said they intended to select John Kerry but when the
computer asked them to verify the choice it showed them instead opting for
President Bush, the group said.

Ralph G. Neas, president of People for the American Way Foundation, which
helped form the coalition, called the summary screen problem "troubling but
anecdotal."

He and other voting rights advocates said the disproportionate number of
Democrats reporting such problems was probably due to higher awareness of
voter protection coalitions.

"Overall, the problems of outright voter intimidation and suppression have
not been as great as in the past," Neas said.

But the reports did highlight computer scientists' concerns about
touchscreens, which they say are prone to tampering and unreliable unless
they produce paper records for recounts.

Roberta Harvey, 57, of Clearwater, Florida, said she had tried at least a
half dozen times to select Kerry-Edwards when she voted Tuesday at Northwood
Presbyterian Church.

After 10 minutes trying to change her selection, the Pinellas County
resident said she called a poll worker and got a wet-wipe napkin to clean
the touch screen as well as a pencil so she could use its eraser-end instead
of her finger. Harvey said it took about 10 attempts to select Kerry before
and a summary screen confirmed her intended selection.

Election officials in several Florida counties where voters complained about
such problems did not return calls Tuesday night.

A spokesoman for the company that makes the touchscreen machines used in
Pinellas, Palm Beach and two other Florida counties, Alfie Charles of
Sequoia Voting Systems Inc., said the machines' monitors may need to be
recalibrated periodically.

The most likely reason the summary screen showed wrong candidates was
because voters pushed the wrong part of the touch screen in the first place,
Charles said.

He said poll workers are trained to perform the recalibration whenever a
voter says the touchscreen isn't sensitive enough.

"Voters will vote quickly and they'll notice that they made an error when
they get to the review screen. The review screen is doing exactly what it
needs to do -- notifying voters what selections are about to be recorded,"
Charles said. "On a paper ballot, you don't get a second chance to make sure
you voted for whom you intended, and it's a strong point in favor of these
machines."

The Election Protection Coalition received a total of 32 reports of
touch-screen voters who selected one candidate only to have another show up
on the summary screen, Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier
Foundation, a coalition member.

David Dill, a Stanford University computer scientist whose Verified Voting
Foundation also belongs to the coalition, said he wouldn't "prejudge and say
the election is going smoothly just because we have a small number of
incident reports out of the total population.

"It's not going to be until the dust clears probably tomorrow that we have
even an approximate idea of what happened," Dill added.



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit 
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message 
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights 
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to