Finjan: Warning users or scaring up business?
Published: November 12, 2004, 2:10 PM PST
By Robert Lemos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
http://news.com.com/Finjan+Warning+users+or+scaring+up+business/2100-1002_3-
5449269.html

Windows XP users could be excused for feeling a little less safe this week.

Security tools maker Finjan Software warned on Wednesday that it found as
many as 10 security flaws in the last update to Microsoft's flagship
operating system, Windows XP Service Pack 2.

In a statement that contained few details, the U.K. company claimed that the
vulnerabilities could enable attackers to remotely access a victim's files,
remove security measures aimed at Internet threats and run programs without
any notification to the user.

Windows XP SP2 "suffers because it is still basically the same operating
system and has some major flaws which compromise end-user security," Shlomo
Touboul, CEO of the firm, said in statement. "By using Finjan's proactive
security solutions...users can enjoy a secure environment that protects them
from such vulnerabilities."

The company did not wait for Microsoft to fix the issues, as many security
companies do, and used the announcement to push its own wares as a way to be
protected from the threats.

While security researchers have sometimes outed flaws in Microsoft products
before the software giant has published a patch, security companies have
generally waited to announce vulnerabilities until Microsoft had a way to
protect its customers. Finjan's press release has reopened the debate over
what should be considered the responsible disclosure of software flaws.

In the latest case, Microsoft believes that Finjan's flaw reports are, in
many cases, overstated or altogether mistaken, said Debby Fry Wilson,
director of marketing for Microsoft's security business and technology unit.

"We do feel strongly that what they are doing is premature, will cause
market confusion and is an overstatement of the breadth and severity," she
said. "We are very disappointed that they are engaged in a PR ploy rather
than thinking about what is best for customers and the security of
customers."

However, Finjan's CEO maintained that the company is merely warning people
that Windows XP Service Pack 2 is not a digital fortress fully protected
from Internet attacks. He labeled the press release education, not
confabulation.

"People need to know that they have to be careful--and without education,
people won't be careful," Touboul said during an interview with CNET
News.com. "I wouldn't say we are scaring people. I don't believe in panic
but in very calculated behavior."

While Touboul did not say whether the company gave Microsoft 30 days to fix
the issue, as has become the industry norm, he maintained that Finjan gave
the software company enough time, and more than enough information to take
care of the issues.

"We don't want to argue with Microsoft about these things," he said. "We
found the 19 vulnerabilities, and we showed that you could take remote
control of a computer."

However, Microsoft's Wilson took issue with Finjan's move, contending that
the software giant does not agree on how many of the flaws are real.
Moreover, because the security company released the issues piecemeal, the
software giant argues that it is not certain that Finjan has even named 10
vulnerabilities.
Digital agenda

"They have been contacting us over time regarding various issues," Wilson
said. "But there is no definitive communications between Microsoft and
Finjan about 10 specific issues."

How and when security vulnerabilities should be disclosed has long been
debated in the security community. Many researchers believe that companies
and individuals should publicly announce vulnerabilities after giving the
software maker enough time to fix them. Usually, programmers get a month to
fix the problems.

The line between marketing products and disclosing security vulnerabilities
should be well-defined for security companies, said Geoff Shively, chief
scientist at security company PivX Solutions.

"Being a security company, you have to consider the impact on global
Internet security before doing anything," he said. PivX has released
software flaw advisories and plugged its products, but the company always
gives Microsoft adequate time to fix the issues, he said. "Vulnerabilities
are too dangerous and too powerful to be used as a marketing tool."

Software creators are frequently angered by researchers who do not allow
them much time to fix problems. A year ago, game information site GameSpy
sent a legal warning to an Italian security researcher who had found holes
in that company's products. In June 2002, Linux software makers became
peeved at security company Internet Security Systems for not giving them
enough time to fix a problem before releasing an advisory about the issue. 



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit 
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message 
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights 
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to