Security training needs complete overhaul
Qualifications 'no indication of true knowledge', claims Doctor of Intrusion
Detection and Prevention
Iain Thomson, vnunet.com 19 Nov 2004
http://www.vnunet.com/news/1159541

The poor quality of many UK-based IT security professionals is placing the
nation's businesses in danger, according to the first man in the UK to get a
PhD in intrusion detection and prevention.

Dr Emlyn Everitt, who was awarded his PhD by the University of Glamorgan
after four years of research, has called into question the value of
qualifications, including those awarded by the Certified Information Systems
Security Profession (CISSP).

He told vnunet.com that qualifications need to be based on real research and
practical experience, and that poorly trained security staff are costing
businesses money and leaving IT systems open to attack.

"The CISSP gives an indication of knowledge, but it is no indication of true
knowledge," said Dr Everitt.

"We need a ground-up rethink of the way we train. It's a similar situation
to the UK space programme: we had the knowledge and experience to compete
with the Russians and Americans and threw it away."

He pointed out that proper management of security resources is as important
as having those resources in the first place, adding that badly managed
security could be worse than no security at all.

In some cases companies were wasting money as they had security hardware but
were unable to use it properly.

Outsourcing is not a solution to this, he continued, since outsourcing
providers need to have someone to check that they are adhering to best
practice.

Professor Neil Barrett of Cranfield University said: "It is certainly the
case that any qualification based on experience is going to be more useful
than a multiple-choice example.

"It is possible to cram for exams like the CISSP and pass. But bear in mind
that most people have worked in the industry for some time before they go
for a qualification."

Dr Everitt, who works for IT firm Logicalis, also pointed out that academics
would need to be paid more if good training was to be built into the
university system.

He explained that a minimum seven years' training would be needed for a
competent university lecturer, but that such academic jobs often had
starting salaries of below �20,000 leaving people with little choice but to
go for higher salaries in industry.



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to