(One wonders where this will end -- will consumers get to draft their own codes of conduct for industry? Doctors? Lawyers? Grocery stores? )
ISP self-regulation proposal entertainment industry 6 April, 2005 http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number3.7/takedown The MPA (Motion Picture Association) and the IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) are pushing for a new collaboration with internet service providers in Europe. The MPA has drafted a 'possible ISP-Film Sector Voluntary Code of Conduct', while the IFPI called for a similar code in relation to the music sector during a conference of European telecom network operators (ETNO). The industry demands that providers "remove references and links to sites or services that do not respect the copyrights of rights holders". Providers should also collectively adopt new terms and conditions, to 'require subscribers to consent in advance to the disclosure of their identity in response to a reasonable complaint of intellectual property infringement by an established right holder defence organisation or by right holder(s) whose intellectual property is being infringed,' thus overruling the essential privacy-protection of internet subscribers and without mentioning any right of reply. The copyright industry doesn't stop there. It also wants providers to develop 'prototype instant messaging language directed at infringers' and a termination of contract for 'recidivists'. Just in case the EU doesn't introduce mandatory data retention, in spite of the repeated lobby of MPAA and IFPI, the providers should voluntarily preserve data/evidence necessary to enforce copyright. And if that isn't enough, ISPs should implement filtering technology to block services and sites that are 'substantially dedicated to illegal file sharing or download services.' But the most ludicrous demand is the following: "To enforce terms of service that prohibit a subscriber from operating a server, or from consuming excessive amounts of bandwidth where such consumption is a good indicator of infringing activities." The promoters of the document seem inspired by a French code of conduct signed on 28 July 2004 by 3 French ministers, representatives of the music industry and major ISPs and telecom operators. This code builds on the French e-commerce legislation (providing for notice and take down measures, see a.o. EDRI-gram 2.12) and the revised French privacy and personal data protection legislation. Under the new data protection act, collecting societies and similar representatives of intellectual property rights have the right to create files with telecommunication traffic data of supposed copyright infringers to 'mutualise the battle against the piracy of works' (see EDRI-gram 2.15). The code has already been used to terminate the contracts of subscribers. It also encourages right-holders societies to sue P2P users. According to a recent article by the French weekly magazine 'Le Point', these cases have led to 'a la carte' penalties, corresponding to the commercial sales price of a song. ETNO has already responded indirectly to these new demands, in a response to the consultation from the Article 29 Working Party of EU data protection authorities. "ETNO Members are also concerned by the constant pressure to overturn the provisions of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) on ISP liability in order to create a situation where intermediaries are liable for illegal content transmitted across their networks. The Directive states very clearly that no systematic obligation of surveillance or monitoring should be imposed on ISPs. Furthermore, Article 15 of this Directive establishes that ISPs should be subject to no general obligation to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activities." And: "In particular, ETNO fully agrees with the Working Document�s conclusion that personal data can only be transferred in very defined cases provided by Law, only to Public Law Enforcement Authorities, and not to right-holders directly." The debate will continue during an open WIPO seminar on ISP liability in Geneva, on 18 April 2005. Announcement WIPO seminar on ISP liability (Geneva, 18.04.2005) http://www.wipo.int/meetings/2005/wipo_iis/en/ Music biz calls on European ISPs to act against P2P sharing (08.03.2005) http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/70163/music-biz-calls-on-european-isps-to-... French code of conduct: 'Charte d�engagements pour le d�veloppement de l�offre l�gale de musique en ligne, le respect de la propri�t� intellectuelle et la lutte contre la piraterie num�rique' (28.07.2004) www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/conferen/donnedieu/charte280704.htm Le Point: Piratage - Des sanctions � la carte (31.03.2005) http://www.lepoint.fr/pointcom/document.html?did=160790 ETNO response to WP 29 consultation on DRM (March 2005) http://www.etno.be/upload/down_files/9241/RD213%20-%20CL%20DP%20issues... EDRI-gram 2.12: Notice and take down procedure validated in French law (16.06.2004) http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.12/len EDRI-gram 2.15: New French data protection act not unconstitutional (04.08.2004) http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.15/frenchdpa (Thanks to Meryem Marzouki, EDRI-member IRIS) You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.
