Airline Tests RFID on the Fly
By Ryan Singel

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,68451,00.html

02:00 AM Aug. 09, 2005 PT

United Airlines pilots and crew are the flying guinea pigs in a test of
controversial new passports equipped with remotely readable chips.

Approximately 300 United employees stationed on international flights
received the new passports in mid-June as part of a three-month,
three-country test of IDs equipped with RFID chips. The chips can be read at
a distance at border crossings by special readers installed for the trial.

The test is intended to see how easily Australia, New Zealand and the United
States can read other's e-passports and how durable the chips are under
constant use.

The new chips are part of post-9/11 security efforts intended to curb
passport fraud and speed up border crossings, according to Frank Moss, the
State Department's deputy assistant secretary for passport services.

"The new passport undercuts the market in lost and stolen travel documents,
because if you steal one of these you are not going to do much with it,"
Moss said.

The 64-KB chips store a copy of the information from a passport's data page,
including name, date of birth and a digitized version of the passport photo.
To prevent counterfeiting or alterations, the chips are digitally signed.

The United States is requiring all 27 countries whose citizens do not need
visas to visit to begin issuing e-passports by October 2006. The original
deadline was October 2004, but wrangling over standards and privacy
protections has delayed upgrades by many of those countries.

Stateside critics would like to derail the current U.S. effort -- they
believe the unencrypted chips could endanger Americans. Because the chips
can be read from several feet away, they could serve as a beacon to thieves
and terrorists targeting Americans traveling abroad, critics say.

They argue the chips should either be locked down with encryption or
replaced with optical technology that can only be read if the passport is
flipped open.

When the State Department opened the plan for public comment, over 2,000
individuals, along with privacy and business-travel advocacy groups,
criticized the technology.

In response to that criticism, and demonstrations of the chips' range, the
State Department included some shielding in the covers of the passports
given to the United employees. The agency didn't disclose what kind of
material it used, but it has in the past publicly considered employing a
metallic fiber weave in the cover.

The United States is also contemplating more safeguards, including the
encryption technology it initially opposed, as it moves toward issuing the
passports to the general public in early 2006.

"We are seriously considering the adoption of basic access control," Moss
said, referring to a process where chips remain locked until a code on the
data page is first read by an optical scanner. The chip would then also
transmit only encrypted data in order to prevent eavesdropping.

Roy Want, an RFID expert at Intel, doesn¹t dismiss the possibility that
e-passports could put travelers at risk of being robbed or killed. But he
says covertly reading the devices is not easy in the real world.

"If have your passport in your bag which has metal keys or candy wrappers,
it is going to disrupt the transfer of information," Want said. "If you have
a very sophisticated piece of technology, you may be able to read them, but
someone is not going to walk around with some sort of clever PDA that is
going to measure these."

Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is unwilling
to accept such assurances until he sees the government's test data, which
has not yet been made public. He also questions whether the government is
actually considering using encryption.

"I am skeptical how serious they are about basic access control if they are
testing this in the wild and they are using chips that broadcast in the
clear," Tien said.

Officials from the three countries will meet this week to discuss the
interoperability results, while results from laboratory tests will be shared
publicly in September, according to the State Department. 



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to