http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/22/racial_profiling/print.html


Why racial profiling doesn't work
Terrorist attacks have been carried out by people of all ethnicities. What
police need to look for is strange behavior, not dark skin.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Kim Zetter

Aug. 22, 2005  |  By anyone's standard, Anne-Marie Murphy didn't look like a
terrorist threat. In 1986, Murphy was a 32-year-old hotel chambermaid from
Dublin, Ireland, who was six months pregnant and on her way to marry her
fiancé in Israel. Authorities discovered a bomb in her carry-on bag as she
boarded a plane in London on her way to Tel Aviv.

Kozo Okamoto didn't fit the profile of a terrorist, either. In 1972, he and
two other Japanese passengers had just arrived in Tel Aviv on a flight from
Puerto Rico when they retrieved guns from their checked bags and opened fire
in the arrival terminal at Ben Gurion International Airport, killing more
than two dozen people and injuring nearly 80.

Nor did Patrick Arguello seem like a state enemy in 1970 before he tried to
hijack an Israeli El Al plane flying from Amsterdam, Netherlands, to New
York. Arguello, who was killed by Israeli sky marshals as he tried to carry
out his attempt, was a Nicaraguan who had attended high school in Los
Angeles.

Enemies, Israel has learned, don't always look like the known enemy.
Terrorists, both willing and unwilling (such as Murphy, who was unwittingly
used by her Palestinian fiancé as a carrier for his bomb), come in many
guises, including color, ethnicity and gender.

Which is why racial profiling (in which authorities target people of certain
races or ethnicities) has never worked very well in any environment,
including Israel.

That racial profiling can be a tricky tactic is something Americans should
understand by observing the diversity of some of the terrorists who have
operated on domestic soil or against Americans -- Timothy McVeigh (the
Oklahoma City bomber), Eric Rudolph (the abortion clinic bomber), Richard
Reid (the ponytailed British-Jamaican who tried to bring down an American
Airlines jet with his shoe) and the Arab hijackers who crashed into the
World Trade Center's twin towers.

Yet last month, when Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced a program to randomly
search New York subway passengers after the London tube bombings, two city
politicians called for racial profiling instead. They insisted that the
enemy's face is an easy one to spot and that authorities shouldn't waste
time randomly searching, say, Norwegian grandmothers when the real threat
comes from Middle Eastern and Asian men.

New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a Democrat, plans to introduce a bill that
would roll back anti-racial-profiling legislation and allow police to stop
whomever they want to stop in their efforts to prevent terrorism. Councilman
James Oddo, a Staten Island Republican, promises to introduce a similar
resolution in the City Council.

"I thought [Hikind] was courageous to say publicly what many New Yorkers
felt privately," Oddo tells Salon.

Although Bloomberg denounced the proposals immediately, Oddo says he got
e-mails from more than 80 people outside New York who expressed overwhelming
support for his proposal. They included a military major serving in Iraq and
the relative of a victim killed in the Oklahoma City bombing. But many
Manhattanites called him un-American and racist. And Oddo's fellow council
members vowed to introduce their own resolution to express support for
current laws that prohibit profiling based on race, ethnicity or religion.

Oddo, who voted for the anti-racial-profiling laws, says that he and Hikind
aren't calling for racial profiling, a loaded term that conjures up
disturbing images. They simply don't want police to fear that if they stop
"an inordinate number of people who look a particular way," someone will
accuse them of violating the individuals' rights.

"Racial profiling is when you stop people because they look a certain way,
without cause, and you're trolling to find trouble," Oddo says. "We never
said, 'Stop only Arab [or] Muslim men, and don't stop whites.' We just said,
'If you're going to engage in these searches, do it in a manner that's more
efficient and more effective."

Being more effective, he explains, means recognizing that the bombings of
the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the USS Cole in Yemen, and the World Trade
Center in New York all had something in common. "The common denominator is
that every jihadi who is engaged in international terrorism has been a young
fundamentalist," Oddo says. "We shouldn't try to couch that reality in some
politically correct terms."

Some people do consider racial profiling unethical, but there are plenty of
other reasons to reject racial profiling, even aside from its violation of
equal protection rights.

David Harris, professor of law and values at the University of Toledo
College of Law in Ohio, says that focusing on specific ethnic groups
alienates the very people authorities need to help them catch terrorists.
"By the time the threat is at the subway or airport, we're down to the last
line of defense," Harris says. "You really want to catch these people before
they go to the subway."

That can be accomplished only by gathering information from people who live
in the communities where sleeper cells reside and can tell authorities who's
new in a neighborhood and who seems to have income without holding a job.

But the most important reason to oppose racial profiling, says Harris, the
author of "Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Cannot Work," is
that, as the title of his book suggests, it simply doesn't work.

Harris says that when police use race or ethnic appearance as a factor in
law enforcement, their accuracy in catching criminals decreases. Even worse,
it can lead to accidental deaths, such as the fatal shooting by London
police of an innocent Brazilian man after the bombings there.

Harris points to a study of New York's "stop and frisk" campaign in the late
1990s, when police were stopping people in the streets on a regular basis in
an effort to confiscate illegal weapons and reduce crime. The campaign
created tension between the police and minority communities, who thought
they were being unfairly targeted for frisks. It turned out they were right.

After Amadou Diallo, an unarmed West African immigrant, was killed during a
stop, New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer ordered a study of 175,000
"stop and frisk" records and found that although African-Americans composed
only 25 percent of New York City's population at the time, they made up 50
percent of the people who were stopped. Latinos were roughly 23 percent of
the population and 33 percent of those stopped, while whites were 43 percent
of the population and 13 percent of those stopped.

Those findings interested Harris less than what the statistics indicated
about the results: Police were going to a lot of trouble for little reward,
especially when the people they stopped were African-Americans.

Harris looked at what he called "hit rates" -- the percentage of stops in
which the police found drugs, a gun or something else that led to an arrest
-- and noted that the number of hits in general was very low for the number
of stops that police made. But more interesting was that the rate for
African-Americans was much lower than the rate for Caucasians. Police had a
hit rate of 12.6 percent when they stopped Caucasians and only 10.5 percent
when they stopped African-Americans. The hit rate for Latinos was 11.5
percent.

"You might say that we have a difference of 2.1 percent between blacks and
whites. But it's actually a difference of 20 percent when you do the math
right," Harris says. And "the difference between whites and Latinos is about
10 percent."

Essentially, police were stopping more African-Americans than Caucasians but
finding fewer criminals among the former. Why? Not because blacks commit
proportionately fewer crimes than whites do (the data vary according to the
type of crime and other factors) but because police were looking at the
wrong factors when they stopped people, Harris says.

"They're focusing on appearance when they should be focusing on behavior,"
he says. "When they're not distracted by race, they're actually doing a more
accurate job" of picking out the right people.

Focusing on appearance produces a lot of false positives. And "every time
you introduce a false positive, you take resources away from your ability to
focus on people who are really of interest -- those who are behaving
suspiciously," Harris says. "If it's a question of finding a needle in a
haystack ... don't put more hay on the top."

What does work in preventing terrorism, Harris says, is behavior profiling.
"If you're going to catch people who mean to put bombs on your subway trains
or in airplanes, you don't actually care [if they're] young Muslim men ...
You care about [keeping] anyone from boarding the airplane who is going to
behave like a terrorist."

Yuval Bezherano agrees. Bezherano is the executive vice president of New Age
Security Solutions, a company that teaches people how to identify behaviors
that indicate a person is concealing something and could be a security risk.
The technique is called behavior pattern recognition and is modeled after
methods used in Israel. NASS's president, Rafi Ron, is a former security
chief at Ben Gurion Airport. The company has trained authorities at Boston's
Logan International Airport as well as personnel at the Statue of Liberty.
Recently the company trained about 100 employees of New York's subway and
bus system.

The signs to watch for can be as obvious as someone acting nervous and
sweating profusely on a cold day or as subtle as someone walking awkwardly
in a way that indicates the person could be wearing a belt of explosives.

"It's always the unusual, the thing that doesn't fit," Bezherano says. "If
you know your environment and what is usual for the environment, you know
what to look for."

Depending on the situation, the next step might be to engage the person in a
targeted conversation to determine whether he or she should be elevated to a
higher level of risk or cleared from consideration.

It was this kind of screening that caught Anne-Marie Murphy, who initially
raised interest among El Al's security staff because she was a pregnant
woman traveling a long distance alone, something that Bezherano says is
unusual behavior. She'd already cleared three security checkpoints at
London's Heathrow Airport before an El Al "profiler" asked her where she'd
be staying in Israel. Murphy's fiancé had warned her not to tell authorities
about him because they would interrogate her if they knew she had an Arab
boyfriend, so she told the profiler she'd be staying at the Hilton Hotel in
Bethlehem. The profiler knew there were only two Hiltons and that neither
was in Bethlehem. When authorities searched Murphy's bag, they discovered
several pounds of plastic explosives concealed in a false bottom and a
microchip detonator hidden in a pocket calculator.

Behavior profiling is much more effective than racial profiling, Bezherano
says, because it's not unusual for terrorist groups to outsource their
operations to individuals or groups who don't fit the expected racial or
ethnic profile.

Patrick Arguello was a member of the Sandinista National Liberation Front
when he posed as the husband of a woman who was an operative for the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine to help her hijack the El Al plane.

Kozo Okamoto was a member of the Japanese Red Army, which attacked Ben
Gurion Airport; the group shared the Marxist ideologies of the PFLP.

Bezherano says there's no reason to believe that al-Qaida won't, or doesn't,
farm out some of its tasks to other groups. "The philosophy of terrorist
organizations is that the enemy of your enemy is your friend," Bezherano
says. "Even though al-Qaida is very extreme, [its members] will collaborate
with others as long it as it serves their cause."

If those working to prevent terrorist attacks on U.S. soil engage in racial
or ethnic profiling, they're merely playing into terrorists' hands -- and
are likely to miss some of the enemies right in front of their eyes.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Kim Zetter is a freelance writer based near San Francisco.



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to