Report: Gov't Secrecy Grows, Costs More
Sunday, September 4, 2005 1:10 PM EDT
The Associated Press
By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN
http://www.adelphia.net/news/read.php?id=12175797&ps=whiteHouse,congress,ele
ctions,government

WASHINGTON (AP) ‹ The government is withholding more information than ever
from the public and expanding ways of shrouding data. Last year, federal
agencies spent a record $148 creating and storing new secrets for each $1
spent declassifying old secrets, a coalition of watchdog groups reported
Saturday.

That's a $28 jump from 2003 when $120 was spent to keep secrets for every $1
spent revealing them. In the late 1990s, the ratio was $15-$17 a year to $1,
according to the secrecy report card by OpenTheGovernment.org.

Overall, the government spent $7.2 billion in 2004 stamping 15.6 million
documents "top secret," "secret" or "confidential." That almost doubled the
8.6 million new documents classified as recently as 2001.

Last year, the number of pages declassified declined for the fourth straight
year to 28.4 million. In 2001, 100 million pages were declassified; the
record was 204 million pages in 1997.

These figures cover 41 federal agencies, excluding the CIA, whose
classification totals are secret.

"These numbers show we are going in the wrong direction," said Rick Blum,
author of the report and director of the coalition of consumer,
environmental, labor, journalism and library groups.

The report also noted the growing use of secret searches, court secrecy,
closed meetings by government advisory groups and patents kept from public
view.

"The 9-11 Commission pointed out that too much secrecy can make us less safe
from terrorists, and the inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina shows the
public needs to know what could happen in their communities and what the
response plans are," said Blum. He said a new law outside the classification
system shrouds "sensitive homeland security information" about
infrastructure vulnerabilities and plans.

"Public engagement in helping fight terrorism or addressing public health
risks is the biggest single advantage American society has," Blum said.

The numbers do not solely reflect overclassification, said J. William
Leonard, director of the National Archives' Information Security Oversight
Office, which monitors classification. Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks,
"many agencies have gone to 24/7 operations, others have increased their
intelligence product, and the military is fighting two wars. You can't do
that without producing more classified, and unclassified, information."

Leonard said classification costs rise as agencies share secrets
electronically. Yet, he said, "the great lesson of 9-11 is that improper
hoarding of information can cost lives and harm national security."

The report identified 50 new restrictions in laws, regulations or "mere
assertions by government officials" that keep unclassified information from
the public. Some are needed to protect privacy or trade secrets, the report
said, but "such unchecked secrecy threatens accountability in government."

These include labels like "limited official use," "critical infrastructure
information" and "operations security protected."

"The volume and impact of these pseudo-classifications is growing," said
Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., chairman of the House national security
subcommittee, and "inhibits the free flow of critical information."

Leonard said, "No one individual in government can identify all the
controlled, unclassified (markings), let alone describe their rules."

Blum said he was encouraged by emergence in the last year of "a vocal chorus
pushing back against secrecy." He cited a bipartisan bill to strengthen the
Freedom of Information Act and efforts like the Sunshine in Government
Initiative, organized by The Associated Press and seven organizations
interested in journalism.

‹‹‹

On the Net:

The report: www.openthegovernment.org/otg/SRC2005_embargoed.pdf



You are a subscribed member of the infowarrior list. Visit
www.infowarrior.org for list information or to unsubscribe. This message
may be redistributed freely in its entirety. Any and all copyrights
appearing in list messages are maintained by their respective owners.

Reply via email to