On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote: > On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: >> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote: >>> >>> thanks. >>> >> >> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have. >> will give a few days to see if any special comments from others. > > Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under the sdk repo > that already exists. IOW, have a single sdk srpm the generates ruby, java, > python, etc bindings?
this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains python bindings, not sure if someone seeking for the python sources need to get java/ruby/etc, as well. having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc bindings, not related to physical bindings repositories i guess, the question is do we want to have different bindings under same place, - this is not that common afaik. >> _______________________________________________ >> Infra mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
