On 03/14/2013 03:44 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote: > On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote: >> On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: >>> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote: >>>> >>>> thanks. >>>> >>> >>> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have. >>> will give a few days to see if any special comments from others. >> >> Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under the sdk >> repo that already exists. IOW, have a single sdk srpm the generates ruby, >> java, python, etc bindings? > > this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains > python bindings, not sure if someone seeking for > the python sources need to get java/ruby/etc, as well. > > having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc bindings, > not related to physical bindings repositories i guess, > > the question is do we want to have different bindings under same > place, - this is not that common afaik.
actually now when i'm thinking about this, gerrit works peer git repo/project, so sending different sources to the single repo ovirt-engine-sdk will be confusing, i.e people that would like to 'watch' sdk-java changes would not be able to differentiate them from the sdk-python/ruby/etc commits. > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Infra mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra >> > > -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
