[ 
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35969#comment-35969
 ] 

Barak Korren edited comment on OVIRT-1918 at 3/6/18 10:55 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

{quote}
So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
get released.
{quote}

This statement is false - what will happen in this case is that a bisection 
search will run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes 
for A and B to pass. This si the whole point of CQ and the difference between 
it and the 'experimental' system it replaced.

[~sbona...@redhat.com] Unless you need further clarification, I will close this 
ticket as WONTFIX.


was (Author: bkor...@redhat.com):
{quote}
So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
get released.
{quote}

This statement is false - what will happen in this case is that a bisection 
search will run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes 
for A and B to pass. This si the whole point of CQ and the difference between 
it and the 'experimental' system it replaced.

[~sbona...@redhat.com] Un;ess you need further clarification, I will close this 
ticket as WONTFIX.

> Single project tests in change-queue-tester
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OVIRT-1918
>                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918
>             Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
>          Issue Type: By-EMAIL
>            Reporter: sbonazzo
>            Assignee: infra
>
> Please change change-queue-tester jobs for testing a single project at a
> time (ok for multiple patches at once, but from the same project).
> Right now if multiple patches are merged between a change-queue-tester
> execution and the next one are done, all of them will be tested in the next
> run, even if the changes are in different projects.
> So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
> can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
> get released.
> This cause major headaches at least to me, requiring me to go again over
> all the HEAD of the projects not being published and run yet again "ci
> re-merge please" again and again and again until I'm lucky enough to have
> nobody else merging patches or having all the ttested patches pass at once.
> I understand the need to reduce the amount of executions of the job since
> it takes an hour to execute but right now it's stealing days of execution
> for getting a patch landing on tested repo.
> -- 
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Reply via email to