On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:22:31AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:21 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:10:59AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi > > > >> > > <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place > > > >> > > which would > > > >> > > replace checks performed by autocloud. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > (CC'ed tflink and kparal) > > > >> > > Does taskotron provides capability to perform tests on Fedora > > > >> > > cloud Images > > > >> > > like booting images and other basic checks? > > > >> > > > > >> > (My email to the list was rejected because I'm not subscribed, let > > > >> > me try again from the web UI...) > > > >> > > > > >> > Theoretically it is possible using nested virt. However, Taskotron > > > >> > is going away as well. The replacement is Fedora CI: > > > >> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/ > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> But Fedora CI is broken and/or vaporware. How can we replace Taskotron > > > >> with that? > > > >> > > > > > > > > Honestly.. weren't we saying the same damn thing about taskotron until > > > > Fedora CI became the latest thing to rail about. It was constantly 'why > > > > do you spend time on this broken crap' and then it becomes the 'oh why > > > > are you replacing my favorite thing in the world'. I am pretty sure > > > > there are multiple thesis and doctorates on the codependency that > > > > OpenSource developers exhibit.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I actually don't remember this for Taskotron... I'm pretty sure that's > > > because most of us can't interact with it. > > > > > > The problem with Fedora CI is that it's documentation is useless and > > > attempts to use the system end in miserable failure. > > > > Sorry for asking, but could you point me to the tickets you've opened for > > the > > issues you've seen/faced? > > I personally haven't opened any tickets because I can't figure out how > to use it. But I've heard from others (Fabio, Miro, etc.) that none of > it works, so I haven't bothered trying to dig into it anymore.
Would be nice to rely on your own experience rather than hearsay :) I'm not saying Miro hasn't had problems, he has said so in a few occasions before with links to tickets he opened but I'm hearing a lot of people bad-mouthing CI while there aren't so many tickets on: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/ considering how wide it is deployed and should impact the community. So I'm questioning if people are bad-mouthing because they've heard other people doing it or because they have legitimate issues that have been reported and should be fixed. I'm very happy to help raise concerns/issues from the community about issues about the CI pipeline but I need to have hard-facts and tickets to be able to do so, not hear-say. Thanks, Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
