On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 21:42 Randy Barlow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 14:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It's not a bad feature to have in fedpkg, but it fundamentally does > > not help *other people* discover what we have in the distribution. > > Yeah I've discussed this a bit with some people, and I agree. Fedora > *users* might use the packages app to find out the same info that > packagers want to find out. > > However, I think that even though users and packagers are coming to > this app for the same purpose, only one of those purposes maps to the > CPE team's mission statement: the packager's. If you are a packager, > you *need* to know what versions are where at a glance, especially when > dealing with something high priority like a CVE. > > That's not to say that the end-user story isn't a valuable use case, > but our team is overburdened and we need to drop most of what we do > right now, and we have to be specific about what our purpose is. This > means dropping some valuable use cases. > https://pkgs.org/ might be a good replacement for that. Does anybody have used or is using this website ? Any feedback on it ? > Of course, this is also my own opinion, and I welcome disagreement. > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to > [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
