On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:32:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 08:34, Patrick Uiterwijk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
...snip...
> > An alternative could be to just increase the required spam-score from
> > Basset to *very* high numbers (in the thousands), so it never sees
> > someone as spam.
> > That last one would mean it also doesn't need changes in the other
> > apps that might be integrated with it, and it would still get all the
> > useful info.
> >
> 
> That is probably the better plan. The tool has been very useful.. it is
> just needing someone to do the tuning work  or to expand it to do that
> learning itself. I do not have that time, and I would prefer that people
> knew that versus expecting to improve by itself.

Yeah, the timesink is mostly 'spamcheck_manual' people. If we could
adjust things so those just got passed I think it would go a long way to
reducing this. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to