On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:03:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 21:59 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:51:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:27 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > > > Just like every team we have technical debt in our work. > > > > I would like your help to try to define what it is for us. > > > > > > > > So far, I've come up with the following: > > > > - python3 support/migration > > > > - fedora-messaging > > > > - fedora-messaging schema > > > > - documentation > > > > - (unit-)tests > > > > - OpenID Connect > > > > > > > > What else would we want in there? > > > > > > > > > > These are all good things, especially the documentation one. I'd like > > > to zero in on a particular aspect of documentation, though: getting to > > > hack on it. A lot of our projects are surprisingly difficult to get up > > > and running for someone to play with and hack on, and this is > > > increasingly true as we adopt OpenShift-style deployments. One way we > > > solved this in Pagure is by providing some quick start processes in > > > the documentation and a fully working Vagrant based process to boot up > > > and have a working environment to hack on the code. > > > > > > I'm not necessarily going to specify it needs to be Vagrant for > > > everything, but I think this is something we should have for all of > > > our projects, so that people *can* easily get going to use and > > > contribute. > > > > I've recently had quite some pain with vagrant (just today, I've tried > > several > > time to start my bodhi vagrant box and lost my morning w/o success). > > > > I guess it may be nice to see if there is something else out there that we > > could > > leverage. > > If we could adopt one and try to get have it on most of our apps this may > > be a > > nice goal for us to work towards. > > The thing is, even if vagrant *itself* is shonky as hell (I agree), if > you vagrant-ify a project, there is at least a recipe I can relatively > easily follow in a manually setup VM or mock root or whatever I like. > The fact that the recipe is designed for vagrant is almost incidental, > the key thing is that there's an 'official' "here's how to set up a dev > env from scratch" recipe.
Agreed, the basic ansible attached to the project is helpful to get an idea on how to get it to work (with some caveats such as the vagrant box is more likely configured for dev than for prod (ie: running from the git checkout mounted within the vm than running via wsgi/gunicorn from an app properly installed)). I wonder if https://github.com/karmab/kcli maybe a suitable replacement to vagrant. Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
