Thanks. When you say type of mail being delivered what are you referring to
exactly?
--
Regards,
Raven R. Cecil
"During wartime few can remember peace, and during peacetime few can
remember war." - Unknown
"Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties
disappear and obstacles vanish." - John Quincy Adams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
find / -user you -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \;
--
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:58 AM
To: inFusion Support List
Subject: Re: [iMS] iMS Post 2.1 RC 12 now available
If you don't use the cfx in a loop then you will use less disk space and
possibly have better performance. Performance depends a
lot on the type of mail being delivered. But, overall, I would say that
yes, iMS 2.1 is faster than any other version of iMS.
Regards,
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: [iMS] iMS Post 2.1 RC 12 now available
> So if we did not use a cfx_mail tag inside a cfloop, will we still see a
large performance improvement?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Raven R. Cecil
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^=======================================================
