----- Original Message ----- From: "Guillermo Dewey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:32 PM Subject: [iMS] in set versus arrays/structures
> hi howie > > what are the resources taken using <in set> compared to a cf structure or > cf arrays? I just finish the new smtp today using <in set> to take vars > from one template to another.. it works pretty good and way more efficient > and functional than our old smtp but I was thinking of passing variables > using arrays on a session variable instead of <in set>, do you thing this > would make things faster? Internally, iMS stores inSet vars in a dynamic, sorted linked list. It's probably as fast or faster than the other method that you mentioned. Of course, you already know that the limitation is that you cannot store complex structures with inSet - only values or delimited lists. > since I am not sure how the ims manage the inset > I cannot tell.. I could if I make the 2 versions and make an evaluation > under heavy load test's but you could save me some time since you know the > insides of ims :) > <g> > by the way this are our average smtp times under regular incoming email > > rcpt .04 ms on each recipient > data .07 ms on each data with an average of 5 local recipients > > this is using a single 550 PIII server using ide hard drive with 64 MB of > ram with access 2000 db. sending massive email from other server sending > 300 simultaneous requests ... results are way way better than our old > code using a larger server > Those are incredibly fast times. Good work! > has anybody or your self made any time measurement for rcpt or data > processing before on ims or other smtp? just want to see what are normal > times to process this smtp commands specially the 2 last ones. > I haven't taken measurements like this in a long time. And, the code that we use for our mail server is based on the old FusionMail code which is not the tightest code in the World <g> > PD > > Sorry if this issue has being discussed before =) I probably missed the > thread Not to worry - questions are what this list is here for. Also, I think we all benefit from seeing what someone else is doing. Regards, Howie > .. > > > ******************************************** > * Ing. Guillermo Dewey Guerra > * Metro Solutions S.A. de C.V. > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * ICQ: 25876549 (GDewey) > * > * http://www.metro.com.mx > * http://www.ablecommerce.com.mx > * > * Tel. (011) (52) (8) 3-90-7000 > * Fax (011) (52) (8) 3-90-7001 > * Cel. (011) (52) (044) (8) 3-09-24-16 > * Monterrey N.L. Mexico > ******************************************** > ==^======================================================= This list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers" -------------------------------------- To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here: http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/ Note: You are subscribed as [email protected] ==^=======================================================
