I understood that part. I was pointing out the part of massaging variables
before they are stored in inSet. Whether it's possible to do this for
inSet, of course, is beyond my ken, as I noted earlier.
best, paul
At 11:58 AM 3/5/02 -0500, you wrote:
>I wasn't talking about ColdFusion. iMS has a function called inSet that
>allows you to store simple name/value pairs that you can
>use in your templates. The iMS variable storage is simpler than
>ColdFusion variable storage.
>
>Regards,
>
>Howie
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul smith)>
>To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:47 AM
>Subject: Re: [iMS] in set versus arrays/structures
>
>
> > This might be off-topic since I don't know what the Hell you're talking
> > about, but ColdFusion WDDX can be used convert complex structures to simple
> > ones.
> >
> > best, paul
> >
> > At 09:41 PM 3/4/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Internally, iMS stores inSet vars in a dynamic, sorted linked list. It's
> > >probably as fast or faster than the other method that you
> > >mentioned. Of course, you already know that the limitation is that you
> > >cannot store complex structures with inSet - only values or
> > >delimited lists.
> >
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^=======================================================
