Hm. When looking over my attachments, none of the mail headers had Content-Transfer-Encoding as a header. It's really a question of that specific header in use rather than attachments in general.
> Most every attachment nowadays is encoded like that. For example, an html email >from Outlook Express will have images > contained in the mail like that. > > Howie > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:40 PM > Subject: [iMS] Base 64 mail > > > I'm thinking of adding a new filter to my spam engine based on >Content-Transfer-Encoding of base64. Has anyone gotten > anything legitimate using this encoding type? Is it common in Europe or Asia for >normal mail? I know a number of > spammers use it to 'hide' their content from content scanners. > Thanks > > Michael Dinowitz > Master of the House of Fusion > http://www.houseoffusion.com > ==^======================================================= This list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers" -------------------------------------- To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here: http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/ Note: You are subscribed as [email protected] ==^=======================================================
