----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:47
PM
Subject: Re: [iMS] full tokenization not
happening
I am intimately familiar with the differences
between a Cold Fusion variable and IMS tokenization. Tokenization does
not always work. Here's an example of a message I got where tokenization
doesn't work:
BTW, since this message might get tokenized, I'm
changing the above line to "Sent to <smtpto:>", that's what's
showing up in my messages.
Howie, I'll add you to one of my lists so you can
see the problem. I wish I could consistently duplicate the problem, but
I can't.
You asked in a recent email message why it took
someone a year and a half to report a bug. Sometimes you respond to bugs
by saying it's the user configuration, specifically with me you've said that
since no one else has ever reported the problem, it must be on my
system. Consistently, that has not turned out to be the case: the Error
102 problem, the Post Dying problem, the Post Memory problem, and, I promise
you, the tokenization problem and the bounce-back problem. Your
rapid-fire response that implying that I don't know the difference between CF
and IMS is off-base -- I know the details of IMS as well as anyone on this
list.
I know you'd like more examples from me, it's
very, very hard to debug when the log doesn't work (in this case, the
tokenization).
I appreciate the opportunity to beta-test, and
will be happy to continue providing feedback when things aren't working.
But when I say I'm 100% sure that something's not working as it should, I'd
appreciate the benefit of the doubt.
Tac
