> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:42 PM
> To: inFusion Support List
> Subject: Re: [iMS] post server logging and unmatched received headers
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raven R. Cecil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:58 PM
> Subject: RE: [iMS] post server logging and unmatched received headers
> 
> 
> > The 66...209 address was the original address for this 
> machine and has
> > functioned soundly as a mail/web server for the past 12 
> months.  The 64...39
> > IP was added as an additional NIC/IP combination just 
> recently.  Also, I am
> > not sure if it is related, but today I went over the logs 
> thoroughly and
> > found that the POST server is using 65.117.116.209 when it calls the
> > internal templates (Report Post Status, Data, etc).  
> 65.117.116.209 has not
> > existed on this machine for more than 12 months!  Where 
> could the POST
> > server possibly be getting this address?
> >
> 
> It's getting it from the RDNS of ezinemanager.net.  iMS tries 
> to match the sending IP to the domain.   You can override
> this by using the setting in the CFX tag.


The RDNS for ezinemanager.net is 66.202.57.209 not 65.117.116.209. The
latter address has not existed for months.


Regards,
Raven


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Howie
> 
> > We are using Windows 2000 Server with dual NIC cards, and 
> the second NIC was
> > added at the same time as the new IP address, which was 
> just a few weeks
> > ago.  We have web sites running successfully through both 
> IP addresses on
> > the same server.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raven
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:07 PM
> > To: inFusion Support List
> > Subject: Re: [iMS] post server logging and unmatched 
> received headers
> >
> >
> > Is 66.202.57.209 configured in Windows properly for 
> connection to the
> > Internet?  The address that iMS prints in the log
> > file is the address that it requests for use and Windows 
> may override the
> > request.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Howie
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Raven R. Cecil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:20 PM
> > Subject: RE: [iMS] post server logging and unmatched 
> received headers
> >
> >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raven R. Cecil
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
==^=======================================================
     This list server is Powered by iMS
   "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
   --------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at 
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=======================================================


Reply via email to