Does this new version send the html of a multipart as an attachment? Is there any way you could send us the changes you've made in your encoding scheme? Thanks Howie.
Mark Kecko Technology Mediapost Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 2:57 PM To: inFusion Support List Subject: Re: [iMS] CFX_iMSMail version 3.2 beta 1 is now available At this point if 2.9.6 is working for you then I'd stick with that one. 3.x does encode emails in a different way than older versions and we're trying to get as much compatibility as possible with this new version so you may want to upgrade some time in the future. Regards, Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: Re: [iMS] CFX_iMSMail version 3.2 beta 1 is now available > Howie - are there any other improvements or fixes in this version other than > the one you mentioned? If we were not experiencing the token problem is > there a reason to move from ver 2.9.6? > > John > ==^======================================================= This list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers" -------------------------------------- To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/ Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here: http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/inFusion-email%40eoscape.com/ Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^=======================================================
