At 6/3/2003 09:46 PM -0400, Howie Hamlin wrote:
>I announced several times that iMS 2.4f requires cfx version 3.3.
Sorry... I guess it didn't "sink in" or something.
> The cfx is downward compatible with older versions of iMS, BTW. If you are sending
> mail with 1 control file and 1 mail file then the version doesn't matter. If you
> are sending mail with more than one control file associated with a single mail file
> then the 3.3 version is mandatory because there are now counter files that are
> needed in these situations and these are only in the latest cfx.
OK you're saying the spec for putting mail into the iMS queue has changed. This I
imagine can have some fairly far-reaching consequences for anyone's custom solutions
out there. I know it does here, somewhat, so we're probably stuck at a lower version
for now. Is the new spec documented anywhere? Also, do you plan on updating the COM
object to support the new spec?
Thanks,
-Max
>Regards,
>
>Howie
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Max Paperno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:37 PM
>Subject: [iMS] cfx/ims versions (was Mail files missing)
>
>
>> Howie,
>>
>> Is cfx_imsmail 3.3 required for iMS POST 2.4.6? Older CFX's will cause problems?
>> mail-archive.com is down so I can't look up if I missed/forgot something about that
>> from you on the list :-) If yes, then my next question will be: why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Max
>>
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=======================================================
