That procesing is independent of CFMX (except for when CFMX calls the CFX tag). is it
possible that the CFX is not remaining loaded? Maybe if you did some testing and
logged the time it takes to call the CFX in a loop it would show whether that was the
bottelneck or not. For example:
<cfloop ...>
<!--- note GetTickCount here --->
<cfx_imsmail spooldir="c:\deleteme\" ...>
<!--- print tickcount difference here --->
</cfloop>
This way, you can see how long it takes for CFMX to call the CFX and complete.
HTH,
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: [iMS] iMS slower on CFMX?
> Since moving the HoF machine up to CFMX and the latest iMS, I've seen some
> longer delay periods between messages going out. Has anyone else seen such a
> slowdown or is it just my imagination.
> As an aside, it's not the scheduling system as I've rewritten that heavily to
> make better use of CFMX. It's the point where CFX_IMS puts the mail into the
> queue and the mail goes from the queue out to the world.
>
>
> Michael Dinowitz
> Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know you had yet
>
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS
"The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at
http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/
Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/Developers/
List archives: http://wwwmail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=======================================================
