On 9 Oct 2003 at 16:13, Matthew Boyce wrote: > Yeah. We are now going to go that direction. Putting the bounce > email address in all the possible headers to ensure we get as complete > coverage as we can.
If you're using the same address in all the headers, why bother putting in any headers other than "From:" (and the return path in the SMTP FROM, which isn't really a header)? "Errors-To:" and "Warn- To:", which you mentioned before, are nonstandard or deprecated anyway, and there's no reason to have "Reply-To" if it's the same as "From:". -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tobacco Documents Online http://tobaccodocuments.org ==^======================================================= This list server is Powered by iMS "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as a free service. Although we will try to address issues in a timely manner, support via this list is not guaranteed. If you require expedited support then a support contract is required. Support may be purchased from http://www.coolfusion.com/commerce. Details regarding support options may be reviewed at: http://www.coolfusion.com/SupportOptions.cfm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/ Need an iMS Developer license? Sign up for a free license here: http://www.coolfusion.com/Developers/ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/ Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^=======================================================
